The phrase “psychic skills” often describes experiences that people interpret spiritually: a vivid mental picture, an unexpected phrase, a feeling about someone, or an association that comes while holding an object. Those experiences can feel meaningful. Their intensity, however, does not establish where they came from or whether they reveal information unavailable through ordinary means.
This guide explains seven labels used in psychic discussions without treating them as confirmed extra senses. It also separates the labels that are easy to confuse, especially clairempathy, clairsentience and clairtangency. You do not need to fit yourself into a category, and a strange sensation is not a diagnosis of psychic ability.
Quick guide
The seven terms here describe claimed ways of receiving impressions: seeing, hearing, emotion, bodily feeling, smell, taste and touch. The useful question is not simply “Which clair am I?” but “What did I actually experience, what am I inferring, and how could I check that inference?” Keep personal meaning separate from evidence, and do not use a reading to diagnose health concerns or decide what someone else secretly thinks.
Understanding the seven “clairs”
These categories are vocabulary, not a standardized assessment. Different writers use different lists; some include claircognizance, or “clear knowing,” while others distinguish emotional impressions from bodily feelings. A list with seven entries does not show that there are exactly seven abilities, that everyone has one to three, or that possessing more would make someone more advanced.
1. Clairvoyance: visual impressions
Clairvoyance is commonly described in spiritual settings as “clear seeing.” A person may report mental pictures, colors, symbols or scenes and interpret them as psychic information. The interpretation is the claim: a picture in your mind is not, by itself, evidence of an event outside your awareness.
Try describing the experience before explaining it. “I pictured a red umbrella” is more precise than “The universe showed me a warning.” If you then predict rain, record that separate step. The picture, the proposed meaning and the eventual weather are three different things. For more on those distinctions, see clairvoyance and its possible uses.
2. Clairaudience: auditory impressions
Clairaudience is the label often applied to purported “clear hearing.” In accounts of psychic practice, this may mean a phrase that comes to mind or a sound someone interprets as a message. Remembering a song or having inner speech does not establish that a spirit is speaking.
Do not treat hearing a voice that others cannot hear as proof of a gift or an instruction to obey. The NHS guidance on hallucinations and hearing voices recommends urgent medical help for hallucinations. Seek emergency help if voices direct you to harm yourself or someone else, or if there is sudden confusion or rapidly worsening symptoms. Outside the UK, use your local urgent-care or emergency services.
3. Clairempathy: impressions about emotion
Clairempathy is used here for a claimed impression of another person’s emotional state. In spiritual descriptions, someone may interpret a sudden sadness or excitement as an emotion received from elsewhere. That belief should not replace asking the person how they feel.
There is a crucial boundary between “I feel tense around you” and “I know you are angry with me.” The first reports your experience. The second assigns a private state to somebody else. A respectful check might be, “You seem quiet; would you like to talk?” They are free to say no or to describe a completely different feeling.
4. Clairsentience: bodily or intuitive feelings
Clairsentience usually refers more broadly to “clear feeling,” including a gut sensation, heaviness or an intuitive impression about a situation. Its meaning overlaps with clairempathy; this guide distinguishes the bodily experience from the interpretation about emotion rather than pretending the boundary is universal.
A tight stomach before a meeting tells you that you noticed a bodily sensation. It does not establish that the meeting will go badly. You can respond practically by checking the agenda, preparing a question or taking a break without converting the feeling into a prediction. If a bodily symptom worries you, seek appropriate health advice rather than interpreting it through a psychic label.
5. Clairalience: scent impressions
Clairalience is a spiritual term for an allegedly meaningful smell, sometimes associated with a person or memory. Smelling a familiar perfume can prompt a moving recollection, but that does not establish contact with a deceased loved one or tell you their condition.
Check ordinary sources first: nearby people, clothing, cleaning products or an open window. The National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders explains smell disorders, including phantosmia, the sensation of an odor that is not there. New, persistent or troubling changes deserve medical advice. If you suspect gas, smoke or dangerous fumes, follow local safety guidance; do not dismiss a possible hazard as a message.
6. Clairgustance: taste impressions
Clairgustance refers to a claimed psychic taste. Someone might associate an unexpected flavor with a relative’s favorite food. That association can be personally meaningful without establishing that the relative caused the sensation or communicated information.
The NIDCD describes taste disorders, including lingering tastes when nothing is in the mouth and changes linked to illness, medication or dental problems. Ask a health professional about persistent or concerning changes; do not alter prescribed medication on your own. There is no need to taste an unknown substance, handle an unsafe object or repeat an uncomfortable exercise to explore this label.
7. Clairtangency: impressions through touch
Clairtangency, also called psychometry in psychic contexts, is the claim that holding an object reveals information about its owner or history. This is not an established physical property showing that belongings store readable biographies or future events.
An object can contain ordinary clues: an inscription, worn edges, a particular material or a recognizable style. Record those clues openly. Ask permission before handling someone’s possessions, and do not announce supposed trauma, illness or secrets about an owner. Touching an object gives you neither evidence for such claims nor permission to intrude on someone’s private life.
Three feeling-related terms, three useful questions
If the labels blur together, start with what happened rather than choosing a title for yourself:
- Clairempathy: “Am I making a claim about another person’s emotion?” Ask rather than assume.
- Clairsentience: “What bodily or intuitive sensation did I notice?” Describe it without making a forecast.
- Clairtangency: “Did this impression arise while touching an object?” List visible clues and prior information before considering an extraordinary explanation.
One experience may fit several descriptions. That overlap does not create several independent pieces of evidence. For example, a photograph can bring up an image, a remembered song and a feeling together; counting each reaction as separate confirmation would exaggerate what you actually learned.
A short impressions log that keeps misses visible
If you are curious and the exercise feels comfortable, choose one low-stakes question and write your plan before checking an answer. Keep it brief. Do not use health, pregnancy, death, missing people, financial risk or accusations as practice subjects. This is a personal record, not formal research preregistration or a test that can establish paranormal ability.
- Describe the experience: use plain words such as “image of a yellow mug,” not a finished story about its origin.
- List prior information: include conversations, photographs, visible clues and anything the other person already told you.
- Define the proposed match: say exactly what would count and what would not. Avoid “something meaningful will happen.”
- Set a deadline: do not keep the prediction open until some later event vaguely resembles it.
- Record the result: retain matches, misses and outcomes that cannot be checked. Mark missing evidence as unclear, not correct.
- Consider alternatives: note ordinary clues, chance, memory, suggestion or flexible interpretation. Do not erase a miss because another part felt impressive.
A fictional example: the bracelet and the seaside trip
In this fictional example, Nisha holds a friend’s bracelet with permission and pictures a beach. She already knows that the friend enjoys coastal holidays, and the bracelet has a shell charm. Both clues go in the log before she interprets the picture.
Nisha predicts that the friend will visit the seaside that coming Saturday. They agree that a photograph of the sea, a beach-themed café and a trip on another day will not count. On Saturday the friend stays home. Nisha records a miss. A seaside advertisement appearing on Monday does not change it.
The image may still inspire Nisha to plan her own holiday. That is a creative use of an association, not evidence that the bracelet transmitted a future event. Keeping those uses separate allows room for reflection without rewriting the result.
Curiosity does not create an obligation
You can learn the terms without accepting every explanation attached to them. You can also stop journaling if it becomes repetitive, distressing or difficult to put down. No label requires you to practise indefinitely, pay for development or make yourself available to other people’s requests.
For a broader approach to identity and uncertainty, read You and Your Psychic Gifts. If you want to step away, Stopping Your Psychic Abilities focuses on practical boundaries. The most useful skills here are clear observation, honest records, consent and the willingness to say “I do not know.”
Frequently asked questions
What are the seven psychic skills in this guide?
They are clairvoyance, clairaudience, clairempathy, clairsentience, clairalience, clairgustance and clairtangency. This is a spiritual classification, not a validated list of seven additional human senses.
Why is claircognizance missing from this list?
Different spiritual guides group the clairs differently. Some include claircognizance, usually described as clear knowing, while others separate emotional impressions from bodily feelings. There is no universal diagnostic checklist that this article must complete.
How do clairempathy and clairsentience differ?
In this guide, clairempathy refers to an impression about emotion, while clairsentience refers more broadly to bodily or intuitive feelings. The labels overlap, and neither makes your interpretation of another person’s private feelings a fact.
Does touching an object reveal its owner’s past?
That is the claim associated with clairtangency or psychometry, not an established property of objects. Wear, material, inscriptions, prior knowledge and guesses can all influence a reading. Obtain permission and separate observable clues from unverifiable stories.
What makes an impressions log more useful?
Write the exact impression, prior information, proposed match and deadline before checking the result. Retain misses and unclear outcomes, and do not broaden a prediction afterward. A personal log is a reflection tool, not a controlled scientific study.
Should unusual smells or tastes be treated as spirit messages?
Do not assume a spiritual cause. New, persistent or troubling changes in smell or taste deserve medical advice. Check ordinary environmental sources too, and treat a possible gas, smoke or chemical hazard as a safety issue.
Do I need to develop all seven skills?
No. There is no requirement to identify with these labels or to practise any of them. You may enjoy the vocabulary, keep a short reflection journal, or stop altogether without needing to prove a gift or follow a prescribed progression.









